Valdai Club Discusses Main Trends And Scenarios Of Global Energy Development

19.04.2016

On April 19, 2016,the Valdai Club hosted a discussion about the implications of the Doha summit on world stability and the oil market. 

The discussion was moderated by Ivan Timofeev, Programme director of the Foundation for Development and Support of the Valdai Discussion Club. He posed several questions before the panel, namely what is behind the oil price slump, and key drivers, which could affect future changes.

According to Stephan C. Roh, President and CEO of ILS Energy, a key issue has been the lack of demand for oil, which has led to a certain destabilization of the world geopolitically. However, the Doha summit has not been able to reach any sort of agreement because of key differences among the players.

“The trend is that everyone is fighting for himself alone, so at the moment we have no agreement on the operate level, or even on the wider level,” Roh said.

Joseph Mifsud, Director of the University of Stirling’s London Academy of Diplomacy, said that it is important to look at the failure of the Doha meeting in terms of the disagreements between Iranian and Saudi Arabian interests, in particular, Syria and Yemen.

He noted that it is possible for Russia to work with both Iran and Saudi Arabia to bridge their differences and work toward a comprehensive oil output agreement.

“I think it is possible, I think the voice is perhaps timid and muted, but there is a role for the Russian Federation,” Mifsud said.

Igor Tomberg, senior research fellow at the Center for Energy Studies of the Moscow-based Institute of World Economy and International Relations, noted that Russia has not been as harmed by the threat of loss of investments in the oil exploration sector because of the ruble’s devaluation. 

He noted that Russia has typically remained neutral in negotiations with OPEC, and that the United States’ influence could also impact the attempt at negotiations.

He added that he does not see Iran as a significant enough hurdle in the negotiations because its goals for production increases are relatively small, compared to total world oil output.

However, Iran’s goals have led all other countries to turn against it, he said. 

During the question and answer session, Mifsud noted that there is a great diversity of views on energy across the European Union, which has made it look inwardly, instead of outwardly, creating an opportunity for Russia in the Middle East.

Mifsud added that few European pipeline projects in Europe have been activated, and that many internal factors, such as the Brexit referendum, the migration deal with Turkey and disagreements among major EU subgroups have to be taken into account.

When it came to the Chinese Silk Road project, Roh said that the issue of instability in Afghanistan could make it difficult for pipelines such as TAPI to succeed.

Related articles

Dialogues in the Korean Peninsula: Necessary Preparation to Avoid Failure
21.04.2018
After the year of a perceived imminent crisis over the Korean Peninsula in 2017, the year 2018 so far has been witnessing signs of reduced tensions. While dialogues are positive steps towards a more

Expert: 
Hiroshi Yamazoe

Category:
Expert Opinions
Cuba without Castro Brothers: What to Wait for?
20.04.2018
On April 19, 2018, the National Assembly of the People’s Power of Cuba appointed Miguel Díaz-Canel as Chairman of the State Council. He replaced Raúl Castro, brother of Fidel Castro, the country’s

Expert: 
Vladimir Sudarev

Category:
Expert Opinions
Turkey’s Syria Policy: Leave Well Alone
20.04.2018
Despite Turkey’s military and political achievements in the Astana process in cooperation with Russia and Iran, Ankara’s stance on the recent Western military operation against Damascus was highly

Expert: 
Ferit Temur

Category:
Expert Opinions