On April 28, in Paris, Valdai Club together with IFRI held the second in a series of roundtables on the crisis in Ukraine. The roundtable brought together more than 80 Russian, Ukrainian, French and European experts and officials, members of the business community and the media.
On April 16, Berlin hosted the first in a series of roundtables initiated by the Valdai Discussion Club on the crisis in Ukraine. More than 30 experts from Austria, Germany, Hungary, Russia, Ukraine and the USA took part in the discussion of the causes of the crisis and future scenarios.
The Valdai Discussion Club presents its new paper, “National Identity and Russia’s Future,” based on the discussions at the club’s 10th anniversary conference in September 2013 and subsequent work of the expert groups. The paper attempts to answer the most fundamental of questions: Who are the Russians, and what does their future hold?
The report presented at the 11th Krasnoyarsk economic forum on the 27th of February 2014 is a follow-up to the report Toward the Great Ocean, or the New Globalization of Russia, published by the Valdai Discussion Club in July 2012, and is based on the conclusions drawn in that report.
Evaluating Russia’s development index during the annual poll this year, experts of the Valdai Discussion Club spoke positively about the country's growing role in national, regional and global security, foreign policy and soft power. Most negative assessment was given to performance of Russia’s political institutions, public confidence in them and the dynamics of economic development.
The main premise of the book is that Russian-U.S. relations have been through four “resets” since 1991. Periods of thaw alternated with disappointment in each other and even cooling off. Therefore, the author’s aim is to reveal the limits of potential bilateral partnership and find a formula for stable partner relations without ups and downs.
Oliver Bullough has visited Russia many times and lived in Russia for long stretches of time as a Reuters correspondent in Moscow and in other capacities. The author analyzes Russia’s national crisis through the lens of the life of dissident priest Dmitry Dudko and seeks to understand whether Russia has a future as a nation.
Morrison portraits Lina’s life with Prokofiev in the West and in Moscow against the backdrop of tragic political events, her unhappy marriage to the great composer and the horrors of her life in Stalin’s gulag camps, where she spent eight years after Prokofiev left her for another woman.
Russia is clearly still a long way from anything that we are used to seeing in the West, but the Moscow Mayoral election, bizarre as its circumstances are, show signs of a step in the right direction.
It is obvious that Russia and Vladimir Putin intend to build pragmatic cooperation with all those ready to build relations on equal and mutually beneficial terms. China is a very conven-ient partner in this regard. There is no need to remind of all the assessments made by leaders of both countries during the course of their high- and top-level meetings.
Under Putin, it seems that there will be no more celebration of the end of Communist rule and a glorious victory for Russian democracy: the price paid for it is now deemed to be too high. Time has not come yet, however, for a new official reading of that part of the country's history.
August 22 marks 110th anniversary of the birth of Deng Xiaoping, the architect of reforms in the People’s Republic of China. His role in shaping the history of modern China is difficult to overstate. His Chinese model is too specific to be copied in other countries, such as Russia.
Earlier this month, Russia hosted the Fourth International Meeting of the Arctic Council at Naryan-Mar, a seaport in the Barents Sea, to discuss issues relating to the infrastructure and safety of ships passing through the Northern Sea Route (NSR).
The key Russian speakers included Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, and Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov. The other speakers included Belarusian Defense Minister Yuri Zhadobin, Pakistan Defense Minister Asif Khawaja, Iranian Defense Minister Hossien Dehghan, CSTO Secretary General Nikolay Bordyuzha, the political commissioner of China’s Lanzhou Military District General Li Changcai, Egyptian Deputy Defense Minister Mohamed Said Elassar, and Indian Deputy Defense Minister Anuj Kumar Bishnoi.
Today, there is a need to take note that the Eurasian debate itself is not a monolithic on the whole and in its various forms serves distinct purposes. What seems to be emerging in multiple visions where each region has its own perspectives.
The world order laid down by the Atlantic Charter was based on U.S. military and economic dominance. To all intents and purposes, Washington will maintain its military dominance for the foreseeable future. Economic dominance is another matter.
In an effort to break the impasse, a group of American and Russian experts and former officials—including an ex-director of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service and a top Russia advisor to George W. Bush—recently met on an island in Finland.
It seems to be the case that Europe and the US are actually in dire straits as a result of the Ukrainian crisis, brought on by pandering to their extreme right-wing circles and without taking into consideration possible consequences.
Nato is to deploy its forces at new bases in eastern Europe for the first time, in response to the Ukraine crisis and in an attempt to deter Vladimir Putin from causing trouble in the former Soviet Baltic republics, according to its secretary general.
Face-to-face talks between the Russian and Ukrainian presidents failed to produce a breakthrough for ending the conflict over eastern Ukraine, as Kiev released videos of captured Russian soldiers and rebels pushed toward a government-held city.
There is little doubt that the United States and the European Union will have done their utmost to persuade the Ukrainian president, Petro Poroshenko, to negotiate constructively. President Putin’s position remains unclear.