Russian-American Relations: Exaggerated Threats


In the current environment of Russian-American relations, several different types of threats are being conflated and exaggerated.  There is the threat of interference in each others domestic affairs-both Russian interference in the US elections and US interference in Russia's upcoming presidential contest.  This is a non-kinetic threat, and based on what we know of the mature political systems in both countries, the role of external actors in shaping the outcomes is likely to be very limited compared to internal domestic factors.  To the extent that any response is appropriate, it should be tailored to the nature and scale of the threat.  The deployment of additional armed contingents by NATO is unrelated to this threat, and not an appropriate response. 

To the extent that NATO deployments are an effort to counter new Russian military capabilities revealed in Ukraine and Syria, they are perhaps more justifiable and should not necessarily be seen as threatening from the Russian side.  After decades of downgrading its capabilities on Russia's borders, NATO cannot mount an offensive against Russian territory and NATO's ability to mount a conventional defense of existing NATO members is open to question.  None of these additional deployments change that basic fact, but they can be seen as compensating for relative weakness--a reflection of Russia's regional superiority. 

That said, both sides would be better served by more active efforts to de-escalate rather than improving their preparation for a combat that absolutely must be avoided.  The costs of deterrence--both to Russia and NATO--will simply rise with escalation, and neither side will feel any more secure.  At the moment, military threats on both sides are currently being overstated, but the ensuing paranoia and panic could lead in the relatively short to medium term to deployments that would revive the old Cold War threats.  This costly outcome can be relatively easily avoided with more careful diplomacy and an end to the destructive tit-for-tat retaliatory cycles that have characterized Russian-American relations for the past year.

The root of the problem was the crisis in Ukraine, and to a great extent de-escalation still requires addressing this core conflict.  Trump has resisted the implementation of further sanctions against Russia and has also ignored calls for providing arms to the Ukrainian government.  He finds himself in a similar position to Obama, having to push back against a bellicose Congress and his own Secretary of Defense.  Like President Obama, he has also failed to present a solution to the crisis or to negotiate directly with Russia as a way to move forward out of the conflict.  And unlike with President Obama, there is little hope for optimism that a settlement can be reached within the next three years.  With his campaign manager Paul Manafort under indictment for acting as a foreign agent of the Yanukovych government, and indictment pending for his former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, virtually all direct contact with Russia is viewed as part of a conspiracy.  This makes it even less likely that Trump will be able to play a constructive role.  At best, he can simply prevent counter-productive escalation.
Views expressed are of individual Members and Contributors, rather than the Club's, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Related articles

Donald Trump and Uptick in US-China Trade Tensions
A cycle of trade measures including both formal and informal retaliatory actions will certainly cast a shadow over bilateral and to some extent global trade. Most importantly, one must hope

Clifford Kupchan

Expert Opinions
Russian Approaches to the United States: Algorithm Change Is Overdue
The usual “top-down” algorithm of Russian-American relations will not work under Trump. Hence, it is necessary to change drastically the algorithm – to start building relationships on the “bottom-up”

Andrey Kortunov

Expert Opinions
Trump’s First Year in Office: the Impact Is Profound and Controversial
Donald Trump enters the second year of his presidency as one of the most controversial politicians in the US history. Opinions vary greatly, but one thing is clear: the past year has been marked by

Expert Opinions